wall configurations and performance criteria,
there needs to be discussion and consensus
around the thermal comfort design parameters
for a given project. For instance, in evaluating
the exterior design temperature, ASHRAE establishes exterior design temperatures for locations.
While for Boston, the heating design temperature is 13 F (99% annual cumulative frequency
of occurrence), it’s unlikely that the low temperature will happen during working hours. In
this case, a more representative temperature to
evaluate the glazing design during the daytime
would be closer to the range of 20 or 25 F. In a
college research environment, where hours can
be more inconsistent, it’s important to design to
the stricter exterior design temperature criteria.
There will never be a “one-size-fits-all”
approach to thermal comfort, since it involves
a personal and psychological evaluation of
a given situation, and the exact make-up
in establishing a comfortable environment
will never be universally established due to
so many variables. However, by following
these simple guidelines, architects can make
informed decisions, early in the design process, to design spaces that don’t require perimeter radiant heating.
Lynn Peterman, AIA, LEED AP, joined Payette
in 2013 and brings five years of experience as a
thoughtful practitioner in all aspects of building
design from initial programming studies through
construction. Andrea Love, AIA, LEED AP, is
Payette’s building scientist, leading the firm’s research projects and integrating performance analysis into the design process. Alejandra Menchaca,
LEED AP, PhD, joined Payette in 2013, bringing
in-depth experience in thermal comfort, daylighting and natural ventilation modeling. She serves
as a principle facilitator for LEED compliance.
Glazing design and thermal
comfort: It’s more than
being cool
continued from page 15
• Beyond 80% glazing in 15 F design conditions, perimeter radiant heating will be
required without resorting to glass with
performance characteristics beyond triple
glazing such as quadruple glazing.
While the above conclusions focused on the
glazing percentages and performance, the per-
formance of the solid wall in which the glazing
is placed needs to be addressed. It’s easy to
think that an increased R-value of the solid
wall would mitigate some of the performance
criteria required for the glazing; however even
in a condition with 22% glazing and 15 F exte-
rior design temperature, increasing the wall
performance from R 18 to R 30 has a minimal
effect on the overall façade U-value (0.47 to
0.43). This indicates that when evaluating
thermal comfort and the effect on radiant
temperature, the properties of the glazing will
always govern over adding additional insula-
tion within the solid portion of the wall.
Beyond the technical elements of the exterior
this case, the occupant’s comfort sensation is a
combination of the interior surface temperature
of the window and the potential of downdraft
due to the window height. For the second con-
figuration, the chart indicates that the threshold
U-values are 0.29 and 0.22 for the ribbon and
full-height glass at 60% glazing, respectively.
This means that for two glazing configurations,
having the same amount of glass and access to
daylight and views, the presence of a well-insu-
lated sill will provide comfortable conditions
with a lesser-performing glass. Note that beyond
80% glazing, perimeter radiant heating is need-
ed since glazing assemblies with U-values lower
than 0.2 aren’t commercially available in tri-
ple-glazed assemblies.
CONCLUSION
There are some easy guidelines generated
by this study in setting thresholds for when
perimeter radiant heating would be needed to
maintain a PMV higher than 0.5.
• At lower glazing percentages (punched windows), thermal comfort is dominated by the
potential of downdraft, which is a function
of the window height and U-value. As the
window becomes taller and narrower, the
view factor for that window decreases, but
the impact due to downdraft increases.
• When considering 40 to 60% glazing, an
easy design choice is to create a sill at 2-ft-6-
in or 3-ft above finished floor. For a design
temperature of 15 F, the threshold U-value
for a fully glazed wall with 60% glazing is
0.22; whereas for a ribbon window design
with 63.3% glazing, the critical U-value is
only 0.32, a more affordable option.
Figure 3: U-value vs. view factor -0.5PMV.
COMINGEVENTS
; SEP TEMBER 22-24. I2SL Annual Conference. Orlando, Fla. Sponsored by the International Institute for Sustainable Laboratories (I2SL). www.i2sl.org
; NOVEMBER 5-7. SEFA U.S. Annual Trade Show and Meeting. Miami, Fla. Sponsored by
the Scientific Equipment and Furniture Association (SEFA). www.sefalabs.com
; APRIL 27-29, 2015. Laboratory Design Conference. Atlanta, Georgia. Sponsored by
Laboratory Design Newsletter. www.labdesignconference.com
; MAY 7-8, 2015. 13th Annual Turnkey Conference. San Diego, Calif. Sponsored by ALN
Magazine and ALN World. www.turnkeyconference.com